If ever I had a tough letter to write, this is it. My challenge is to convince you that the most vulgar manifestation of birdbrained sentiment among insidious, contemptible fence-sitters has been the way they pervert the course of justice. Let's review the errors in Kathryn's statements in order. First, Kathryn's shills do not accept the fact that this phenomenon seems commonplace in our disintegrating society. Kathryn says she's not juvenile, but she's decidedly lecherous, and that's essentially the same thing. Will I allow her to intensify or perpetuate isolationism? As long as there is breath in my earthly body, I assure you I will not. What I will do, however, is inform as many people as possible that Kathryn spouts the same bile in everything she writes, making only slight modifications to suit the issue at hand. The issue she's excited about this week is antiheroism, which says to me that I, hardheaded cynic that I am, strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this but Kathryn's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that conversations with her are no more intellectual than a game of darts at the local pub. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if she finds a way to lay down diktats that force me to cower before the emotions and accusations of others.

I will never give up. I will never stop trying. And I will use every avenue possible to resolve our disputes without violence. It has been brought to my attention that the objectives that Kathryn's henchmen are so proud of are woefully malign. While this is doubtlessly true, Kathryn wants us to feel sorry for the contentious rakes who restructure the social, political, and economic relationships throughout the entire society. I maintain we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that the unalterable law of biology has a corollary that is generally overlooked. Specifically, my purpose here is not to say "no" to Kathryn's crude, unprofessional subliminal psywar campaigns. Well, okay, it is. But I should point out that Kathryn's opuscula reek of blackguardism. I use the word "reek" because if one believes statements like, "It is heartless to question Kathryn's antics," one is, in effect, supporting harebrained, hateful morons. As my mother used to tell me, "Kathryn makes no sense at all."

Kathryn wants nothing less than to slow scientific progress. Her apologists then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with satanic hucksters who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that Kathryn insists that she has achieved sainthood. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. As one commentator put it, a central point of her belief systems is the notion that she has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature. Perhaps Kathryn should take some new data into account and revisit that notion. I think she'd find that we can all have daydreams about Happy Fuzzy Purple Bunny Land, where everyone is caring, loving, and nice. Not only will those daydreams not come true, but her politics have merged with classism in several interesting ways. Both spring from the same kind of reality-denying mentality. Both guarantee the destruction of anything that looks like a vital community. And both generate an epidemic of corruption and social unrest. The space remaining in this letter will not suffice even to enumerate the ways in which Kathryn has tried to blitz media outlets with faxes and newsletters that highlight the good points of her unprincipled sentiments. After having read this, you may think that Kathryn's communications are a cancer that gnaws away at the national psyche. Nevertheless, you should always remember that it is better to be a little old-fashioned, but honest and loyal, than enlightened and modern, but illiberal and logorrheic."

and don't ask me what it means, i just copied and pasted :P